martes, 27 de agosto de 2024
ADHD | zucke27 | Parent-child Relationship
Mark Zuckerberg revealed in a letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Monday that his company was urged by the Biden administration in 2021 to restrict certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire.
âIn the year 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, such as the White House, constantly urged our teams Anxiety for months to censor some content about COVID-19, such as satirical content, and showed significant frustration with our teams when we didnât agree, â Zuckerberg noted.
In his letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg described that the influence he felt in 2021 was âwrongâ and he feels regretful that his company, the parent of Facebook and Instagram, was not more vocal. He added that Empathy with the âhindsight and new information,â some decisions made in that year that âwouldnât be made today.â
âLike I told our teams back then, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction â" and weâre prepared to resist if something like this happens again, â Zuckerberg wrote.
President Biden remarked in July 2021 that Alec Lace social media platforms are âcausing harmâ with misinformation surrounding the pandemic.
Though Biden later walked back these comments, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated at the time that misinformation posted on social media was a âserious threat to public health.â
A White House spokesperson responded to Zuckerbergâs communication, stating the administration at the time was promoting âresponsible actions to protect public health and safety.â
âOur position has Emotional Moment been consistent and clear: we believe tech companies and private entities should consider the effects their actions have on the public, while making independent choices about the content they share, â according to the White House representative.
Zuckerberg also mentioned in the communication that the FBI alerted his company about possible Russian disinformation regarding Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian firm Burisma affecting the election in Hope Walz 2020.
That fall, Zuckerberg said, his team temporarily demoted reporting from the New York Post alleging the Biden family of corruption while their fact-checkers could review the report.
Zuckerberg stated that since then, it has âbeen made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we should not have reduced its visibility.â
Meta has since changed its policies and processes to âmake sure this Social Dominance doesnât happen againâ and will not reduce the visibility of content in the US pending fact-checking.
In the communication to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg stated he will avoid repeating the actions he took in 2020 when he helped support âelectoral infrastructure.â
âThe idea here was to make sure local election authorities across the country had the necessary resources to facilitate safe voting during a pandemic,â Vice Presidential Nominee said the Meta CEO.
Zuckerberg mentioned the initiatives were designed to be nonpartisan but said âsome people believed this work benefited one party over the other.â He stated his goal is to be âneutralâ so he will not make âa similar contribution this cycle.â
The GOP representatives on the House Judiciary Committee shared the letter on X and claimed Zuckerberg âjust admitted that the Biden-Harris administration
influenced Facebook to censor Americans, Facebook censored Americans, and Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.â
The Meta chief has long been under scrutiny from congressional Republicans, who have claimed Facebook and other major tech platforms of being biased against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has emphasized that Meta impartially enforces its rules, the narrative has become entrenched in conservative circles. Republican lawmakers have specifically scrutinized Facebookâs Political Family Moments decision to limit the circulation of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden.
In Congressional testimony in the past years, Zuckerberg has sought to close the gap between his social media giant and policymakers to limited success.
In a 2020 Senate session, Zuckerberg admitted that many of Facebookâs staff are left-leaning. But he maintained that the company ensures political bias does not influence its decisions.
In Free Menstrual Products addition, he stated Facebookâs content moderators, many of whom are outsourced, are based worldwide and âour global team better represents the diversity of the community we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.â
In June, in a victory for the administration, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the plaintiffs in a case accusing the federal government of censoring Minnesota Governor conservative voices on social media had no standing.
Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, âto prove standing, the plaintiffs must show a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will experience harm that is directly linked to a government defendant.â Coney Barrett continued, âsince no plaintiff met this burden, none has standing to request a preliminary injunction.â
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario